Undergraduate & master’s
Dissertations, capstones and lab reports. Structure, statistics and a genuinely critical read while there is still time to act on it.
Stuck on the methodology chapter. Sitting on data you cannot interpret. Waiting three weeks for feedback that never arrives. Tell us what you are working on and a verified PhD in your own field will look at it — teaching, analysing, editing and reviewing. Never writing it for you.
Every project is handled by a PhD-qualified specialist — credentials, publication record and practical experience all verified before they join.
Our network spans every time zone, so there is always someone awake. Reach us by e-mail or live chat and we will connect you with the right expert.
Start with a free scoping conversation. Tell us about your project and we will tell you honestly what it needs — and who should do it.
The help that is useful in the first year of a master’s is not the help that is useful a month before a viva. Tell us which of these you are and the match changes.
Dissertations, capstones and lab reports. Structure, statistics and a genuinely critical read while there is still time to act on it.
Methodology chapters, analysis your committee will interrogate, viva preparation, and a second opinion for the weeks your supervisor is unreachable.
The leap from thesis chapters to publishable articles: first-author papers, reviewer responses, and grant applications that survive a panel.
Work brought up to the standard your examiners expect without flattening your voice or quietly changing what you argued.
Hover a tile to see everything inside it. Select a tile to see everything inside it.
If one of these is yours, it is not a sign you are behind. It is the ordinary shape of research, and every one of them has been solved before.
“My data will not behave the way the textbook said.”
Assumption checks first, then the test that suits the data you actually collected — and an explanation of the output in words you can defend out loud.
“My supervisor says the methodology is not tight enough.”
A methodologist reads the chapter and tells you where an examiner will push, what to justify, and what to cut before it becomes a viva question.
“I have three weeks and forty thousand words.”
An honest plan for the time that is left, an editor working on the draft as it arrives, and an order of priority for the parts that actually carry marks.
“My literature review is a pile of summaries.”
Synthesis instead of a list: the themes, the arguments the field is having, and a structure that builds towards your own question.
“Reviewer 2 has asked for analyses I have never run.”
A response plan, the analyses run properly and documented, and a letter that answers every point in the reviewer’s own numbering.
“My viva is in a month and I am not ready.”
A mock viva with doctorates who examine for a living, and a straight list of the questions you are least prepared for.
Four of the specialists you might be matched with.
A distinguished PhD scholar in molecular biology, with numerous publications in top-tier journals and a proven record of impactful research.
A postdoctoral fellow whose interests include polymer-based actuators, artificial muscles and additive manufacturing.
Research spanning advanced materials and sustainable technologies: nanomaterials, photocatalysis, semiconductors, thin films and membranes.
A leading expert in computational physics, working on the simulation of physical systems, algorithm development and high-performance computing.
Tell us what you need — a brief, a question, a dataset, a draft. The more detail, the better we can match you.
We hand-pick the most relevant expert from our network based on your field, scope, and timeline.
Work directly with your PhD expert. Review, iterate, and finalise — with full support from our team.
You should be able to sit in front of an examiner and account for every decision in your project. That is the whole test we apply to what we hand over: if it would leave you unable to answer a question about your own work, it is not finished.
Whatever your department, your software or your journal insists on.
This is the line that protects your degree, so it is worth being blunt about where it falls. Everything on the left is support your university would recognise. Everything on the right we refuse, however the request is phrased.
The full position, in the words we would use with an institution, is on our commitment page.
My stats chapter had been sent back twice. The statistician did not just fix it — she made me rerun it myself on a call until I could explain every line of the output. That is what got me through the viva.
English is my third language and I was terrified of being told the writing was not mine. The editor kept my argument and my voice, and wrote notes explaining every change so I learned from it.
Two weeks before submission I had interview transcripts and no coding framework. A qualitative methodologist built one with me in three sessions and I did the coding. It is my work, and it is far better work.
Starting with the one everybody is too polite to put first.
What we do is the kind of support universities themselves provide through writing centres, statistics clinics and supervision — teaching, editing, analysis and review. What we will not do is write or submit work as you. Every deliverable is built so you can explain it, and we will advise you on how to acknowledge the help you had. If your institution has a policy on third-party support, follow it and tell us; we will work inside it. Our full position is on the Our Commitment page.
No, and nobody who says yes is protecting you. Ghost-writing is the one thing that can end a degree. We work on what you have written, on the analysis behind it and on the thinking in front of it.
That is the usual starting point. Describe the situation in your own words — the brief builder at the top of this page will turn it into something sendable in about thirty seconds — and a doctorate in your field will tell you what the work actually needs, and sometimes that it needs less than you feared.
You are matched with a doctorate in your own field, not a generalist with a style guide. Credentials, publication record and practical experience are all verified before anyone joins the network, and if nobody in it fits your topic we will say so rather than take the work.
A scoping reply usually comes the same working day. Beyond that it depends on the work: a chapter review is days, a full analysis or a systematic review is longer. Tell us the deadline first and we will tell you honestly whether it is achievable and what would have to be dropped.
It is quoted per project, after somebody has looked at what you have, because a two-hour statistics consult and a four-month analysis are not the same thing. The scoping conversation itself is free and carries no obligation.
Your work stays yours. You keep the copyright in everything you send, we sign an NDA on request, nothing is shared or reused, and your files are deleted once the project closes.
Often, yes — and we will be straight with you about the limits. Sometimes the honest answer is that the design cannot support the claim you wanted, in which case we will help you make the strongest defensible claim instead of pretending otherwise.
The rest of them, including confidentiality and how the experts are vetted, are on the FAQs page.
Pick the one closest to your situation and it opens a message with the subject already written. You can change every word of it.
Or simply describe the problem in your own words — that is what most people do.
Tell us what you are working on. Every enquiry is read by a person, and you keep the copyright in whatever you send.